Virginia Dejohn Anderson, Creatures of Empire: How Domestic Animals Transformed Early America (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004)
Marcy Norton, Sacred Gifts, Profane Pleasures: A History of Tobacco and Chocolate in the Atlantic World (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008)
Comparing with Anderson, Norton just wants to further understand the Columbia exchange in the Atlantic world. Norton’s purpose is to beyond the limits of “biological determinism” and “cultural constructivism.” In her book, a central theme is syncretism, which means “an amalgamation of beliefs and practices emerging from different cultural traditions, defined why and how tobacco and chocolate arrived in Europe, as well as how and why they endured in America.”[1] To support her arguments, she explores how this kind of syncretism greatly influenced the reception and spreading of tobacco and chocolate in Europe, as well as the functions of them were changed as history went on. While for Anderson, assuming “livestock deserve a place in the narrative of American history,” she reexamines how Native Americans were different from colonial Americans in domesticating animals and attempts to beyond historical canons in writing early American history.[2] Comparing with Anderson, Norton is not so ambitious, which makes her book not so provocative. Interpreting the Columbia exchange from the perspective of her syncretism, Norton gives us a good example in exploring Columbia exchange.
Since Crosby’s Ecological Imperialism was published in 1972, Columbia exchange becomes a good topic for historians to explore the communications of diseases, animals and plants between the old world and the new world. Following him, the themes and topics of Columbia exchange are greatly explored by historians, which greatly help us to understand world history since the 15th century in a new way. Both Norton and Anderson’s books are a response to Crosby’s Columbia exchange, although they respond to it totally differently. Norton wants to fill the gap of the Columbia exchange by integrating tobacco and chocolate into this kind of Atlantic exchange, while Anderson attempts to revise it and make a grand synthesis. Crosby’s Ecological Imperialism is a classic, however, in the future it will be challenged again and again. Whether its canonic position could be challenged or not, we do not know. But it is undeniable a fact that the Columbia exchange is still in need of further exploration, whatever it is on a big topic or a special product.