Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Directed by David Yates
Cinema Release Date: July 15, 2009
Film already available on DVD since: November 10, 2010
With Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson
Original title: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Feature film, U.S., UK. Genre: Fantasy, Adventure
Time: 02h32min Production Year: 2009
Harry Potter (DANIEL RADCLIFFE) and Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) have finally figured out how to defeat Lord Voldemort (RALPH FIENNES). They go on an adventure in secret.
It is the sixth film, so sixth book and first book in the saga that I have not liked too. DAVID YATES,yet penguin for scenes of action is maintained to achieve. And of course, it is still missing the point of view. Moreover, this is particularly bad in which YATES should excel, the scenes of explanation. This is probably the main actors (aside from the masterful Michael Gambon who deserves to be nominated for an Oscar for his performance and the great Jim Broadbent) as DANIEL RADCLIFFE who can no longer convey the emotions of HARRY POTTER.
Alan Rickman, Robbie Coltrane and Maggie Smith are still forgotten to mount and TOM FELTON is rather average. The film is uninteresting, really poorly done and unfortunately mostly incomprehensible to the poor wretch who watch the movie without having read the book two or three days before seeing the film. It also loses more and more the concept of the school year, prices are still less represented in the film. Steve Kloves has completely missed his script, bringing the hack obviously DAVID YATES on the scaffold. But hey, it's still a movie for connoisseurs correct and far from zero.
If You Have Loved, You'll Love: HARRY POTTER AND THE ORDER OF THE PHOENIX by David Yates, whose style is undeniable, unbearable.
Friday, March 11, 2011
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Directed by David Yates
Labels:
Daniel Radcliffe,
David Yates,
Emma Watson,
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,
Rupert Grint
Cold Mountain Directed by Anthony Minghella
Cold Mountain Directed by Anthony Minghella
Cinema Release Date: February 18, 2004
With Jude Law, Nicole Kidman, Renee Zellweger
American feature film. Genre: Drama, History
Time: 02h33min Production Year: 2003
In an America torn by the Civil War, a man and a woman will do towards each other the most extraordinary journeys. Pastor's daughter, Ada spent his youth in music, art and well-being of a widowed father, she loves more than anything else. Simple worker, Inman is a man of fierce, taciturn, alien to civilized society, steeped in Southern culture and traditions, which surrounds Ada.
A simple glance, some clumsy words, a stolen kiss on the eve of leaving for the front, yet enough to instill absolute love, where Ada and Inman will draw strength and courage to face separation, loneliness, misery, and the most cruel trials of war ...
In 2003, Anthony Minghella found the Talented Mr. Ripley for Cold Mountain, especially when it gathers Nicole Kidman, Renée Zellweger or Natalie Portman (find it for Atonement, her - unfortunately - the last movie) .
The context of the plot is typical of the war widow who thrives on hope one day to return his beloved (the base number of novels such as the adapted A Long Engagement by Sebastien Japrisot). While it is typical that it is interesting. If history speaks of Japrisot conviction and presents it as a strength that allows us to move forward. Cold Mountain, of course, speaks to the strength of hope, but also the precious moments. Reason, any part of the film until the leak has nothing substantially Inman melodrama. Even the start of the war is like asking a particular approach to the genre: Minghella did not film a long kiss with a perfect background music but shows two characters kissing violently as if they took consience after several years of time they lost. However, it is not several years but a few moments. Cold Mountain tells nothing other than how moments of life are so brief they can upset her.
The film opens with an impressive battle with Ridley Scott (the only scene of war) has pretty pretend to give a tone quite different than the actual movie. Playing on the parallel editing, the film still appears as a kind of war movie, but for the love of war (the battle of one to find it - battle each other to live) where the two sides are not enemies, but separated by a force above them. The report to the enemy is also very interesting and speaks volumes about the stupidity of war. The sequence in which the nationalists want to raid the home of Sara (Natalie Portman) is unbelievable in its violence first and then with his purpose: saving Inmar a soldier and asked him his place to hide while Sara, thinking that he abused his baby (when he is alone in worrying about it), shoot him as he started to escape. The view of the young soldier in appearance "enemy", it returns completely customized template and let Sarah as the barbarian, it is not. The war leads to a hatred that switches people in revenge, even the bravest ...
The scene of the well and its purported revelation is the last point that deserves a s'atarde above. This is perhaps the second theme after the epicurean taste to enjoy the moment: the belief. What matters does not seem the obvious - everyone claims logical qu'Inmar died, rocking Ada in a bottomless sadness - but what we chose to believe. This vision is a little "myth" of the well is a reflection of what his heart tells him, "he will come back." And finally this vision clearly showed the dying, yes, but with it, as if the will had clearly beaten.
With all this, so there is a solid foundation that the form does not mess with pretty scenery and especially a splendid game players really dazzling.
A nice story, meaningful, touching and moving.
Cinema Release Date: February 18, 2004
With Jude Law, Nicole Kidman, Renee Zellweger
American feature film. Genre: Drama, History
Time: 02h33min Production Year: 2003
In an America torn by the Civil War, a man and a woman will do towards each other the most extraordinary journeys. Pastor's daughter, Ada spent his youth in music, art and well-being of a widowed father, she loves more than anything else. Simple worker, Inman is a man of fierce, taciturn, alien to civilized society, steeped in Southern culture and traditions, which surrounds Ada.
A simple glance, some clumsy words, a stolen kiss on the eve of leaving for the front, yet enough to instill absolute love, where Ada and Inman will draw strength and courage to face separation, loneliness, misery, and the most cruel trials of war ...
In 2003, Anthony Minghella found the Talented Mr. Ripley for Cold Mountain, especially when it gathers Nicole Kidman, Renée Zellweger or Natalie Portman (find it for Atonement, her - unfortunately - the last movie) .
The context of the plot is typical of the war widow who thrives on hope one day to return his beloved (the base number of novels such as the adapted A Long Engagement by Sebastien Japrisot). While it is typical that it is interesting. If history speaks of Japrisot conviction and presents it as a strength that allows us to move forward. Cold Mountain, of course, speaks to the strength of hope, but also the precious moments. Reason, any part of the film until the leak has nothing substantially Inman melodrama. Even the start of the war is like asking a particular approach to the genre: Minghella did not film a long kiss with a perfect background music but shows two characters kissing violently as if they took consience after several years of time they lost. However, it is not several years but a few moments. Cold Mountain tells nothing other than how moments of life are so brief they can upset her.
The film opens with an impressive battle with Ridley Scott (the only scene of war) has pretty pretend to give a tone quite different than the actual movie. Playing on the parallel editing, the film still appears as a kind of war movie, but for the love of war (the battle of one to find it - battle each other to live) where the two sides are not enemies, but separated by a force above them. The report to the enemy is also very interesting and speaks volumes about the stupidity of war. The sequence in which the nationalists want to raid the home of Sara (Natalie Portman) is unbelievable in its violence first and then with his purpose: saving Inmar a soldier and asked him his place to hide while Sara, thinking that he abused his baby (when he is alone in worrying about it), shoot him as he started to escape. The view of the young soldier in appearance "enemy", it returns completely customized template and let Sarah as the barbarian, it is not. The war leads to a hatred that switches people in revenge, even the bravest ...
The scene of the well and its purported revelation is the last point that deserves a s'atarde above. This is perhaps the second theme after the epicurean taste to enjoy the moment: the belief. What matters does not seem the obvious - everyone claims logical qu'Inmar died, rocking Ada in a bottomless sadness - but what we chose to believe. This vision is a little "myth" of the well is a reflection of what his heart tells him, "he will come back." And finally this vision clearly showed the dying, yes, but with it, as if the will had clearly beaten.
With all this, so there is a solid foundation that the form does not mess with pretty scenery and especially a splendid game players really dazzling.
A nice story, meaningful, touching and moving.
The Human Stain (La Couleur du mensonge)Directed by Robert Benton
The Human Stain (La Couleur du mensonge)Directed by Robert Benton
Cinema Release Date: October 29, 2003
Film already available on DVD since: June 2, 2004
Starring Nicole Kidman, Anthony Hopkins, Gary Sinise
Original title: The Human Stain
American feature film. Genre: Drama
Time: 01h48min Production Year: 2002
A voice in the background suddenly fills the room from the first frame. That voice belongs to Nathan Zuckerman (Gary Sinise), a writer in seclusion, engaged by Coleman Silk (Anthony Hopkins) to relate on paper the story of his life shattering ... The reason for this request? Attempt to exonerate the former dean of a small U.S. school accused by his peers and students of racism, following an unfortunate mistake of vocabulary.
Nicole Kidman
Adapted from a beautiful and poignant novel by Philip Roth, "The Human Stain" deals with serious subjects such as betrayal, scandal, lies, family secrets, denial of origins, death or even forbidden passion. For, indeed, it is grafted over the main plot a disturbing love story between the old man and a young clueless, Faunia Farley (Nicole Kidman), a waitress in a seedy bar and expecting much more of an uncertain future.
The protagonists of this drama reveals deep psychological flaws, they are bruised and resigned, off the beaten track, almost unhealthy yet so human suffering. The viewer is spared no, quite the contrary, and he attended, impotent, a slow and painful descent into hell. Then resulting scenes and dialogues in the rough, unadorned and murderers ...
Wentworth Miller in The Human Stain
Even if Gary Sinise is not perpetually on the screen, his presence is still ongoing, as suggested, being the witness, the narrator, the confidant, the keeper of memory and the past. His character is singular, enigmatic and lonely, an almost perfect role for him, using so with modesty and melancholy eyes hurt. Some moments become, therefore, almost unforgettable, like the one where Nathan left and uncomfortable, starts a swirling waltz with Coleman on the patio of his home, or even one where he meets at a restaurant, terribly embarrassed situation, the beautiful Dulcinea of his friend ... thirty years his junior.
"The Human Stain" is a beautiful film, with a trio of players amazing.
Great art ...
Cinema Release Date: October 29, 2003
Film already available on DVD since: June 2, 2004
Starring Nicole Kidman, Anthony Hopkins, Gary Sinise
Original title: The Human Stain
American feature film. Genre: Drama
Time: 01h48min Production Year: 2002
A voice in the background suddenly fills the room from the first frame. That voice belongs to Nathan Zuckerman (Gary Sinise), a writer in seclusion, engaged by Coleman Silk (Anthony Hopkins) to relate on paper the story of his life shattering ... The reason for this request? Attempt to exonerate the former dean of a small U.S. school accused by his peers and students of racism, following an unfortunate mistake of vocabulary.
Nicole Kidman
Adapted from a beautiful and poignant novel by Philip Roth, "The Human Stain" deals with serious subjects such as betrayal, scandal, lies, family secrets, denial of origins, death or even forbidden passion. For, indeed, it is grafted over the main plot a disturbing love story between the old man and a young clueless, Faunia Farley (Nicole Kidman), a waitress in a seedy bar and expecting much more of an uncertain future.
The protagonists of this drama reveals deep psychological flaws, they are bruised and resigned, off the beaten track, almost unhealthy yet so human suffering. The viewer is spared no, quite the contrary, and he attended, impotent, a slow and painful descent into hell. Then resulting scenes and dialogues in the rough, unadorned and murderers ...
Wentworth Miller in The Human Stain
Even if Gary Sinise is not perpetually on the screen, his presence is still ongoing, as suggested, being the witness, the narrator, the confidant, the keeper of memory and the past. His character is singular, enigmatic and lonely, an almost perfect role for him, using so with modesty and melancholy eyes hurt. Some moments become, therefore, almost unforgettable, like the one where Nathan left and uncomfortable, starts a swirling waltz with Coleman on the patio of his home, or even one where he meets at a restaurant, terribly embarrassed situation, the beautiful Dulcinea of his friend ... thirty years his junior.
"The Human Stain" is a beautiful film, with a trio of players amazing.
Great art ...
Labels:
Anthony Hopkins,
Gary Sinise,
La Couleur du mensonge,
Nicole Kidman,
Robert Benton,
The Human Stain
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Prison Break by Paul Scheuring
Prison Break
Series stopped in 2009 - 4 seasons, 81 episodes
First broadcast on August 29, 2005 U.S.A.
Founded in 2005 by Paul Scheuring
Cast: Dominic Purcell, Wentworth Miller, Sarah Wayne Callies
Original title: Prison Break
American series. Genre: Drama. Format: 42mn
Michael Scofield, an engineer and little genius at times, has decided to go all out to save his brother Lincoln, the electric chair. Accused of the murder of the brother of the Vice-President, he protested his innocence in vain. Michael has one month to integrate the Fox River State Penitentiary, making his enemies, his henchmen and Lincoln to escape certain death before they can prove his innocence ...
Great challenge for this series camera. The first season is exciting. Hard not to get caught up in the game spend all emotions: anxiety, suspense, tenderness, ... and that beloved Michael who has been so programmed his plan, probably does not do it as easily as he thought ... Unfortunately, the seasons that follow are not as exciting. Difficult to keep up on 81 episodes!
The second recounts the escape of eight prisoners who will not be easy. At the same time they try to shed light on the trap that befell Lincoln. But the hour of freedom has not yet come, and some will return to prison at Sona, in the third season. Prison left in the hands of its people, the conditions are harsher than Fox River and the escape will not be as "easy".
Finally the fourth season reveals all the secrets of the family of two brothers, secrets that led them where they are always with a sword of Damocles hanging over your head!
In short no less than three breakouts for Burrows-Scofield brothers and their associates, many missing, many betrayals (it's every man for his apple), all bogged down in countless secrets ... all this could not end in happy ending!
After four seasons of loyal (and not always good) services, the team of Prison Break leaving (finally) our small screens to sail towards new horizons. We wish them good luck!
Series stopped in 2009 - 4 seasons, 81 episodes
First broadcast on August 29, 2005 U.S.A.
Founded in 2005 by Paul Scheuring
Cast: Dominic Purcell, Wentworth Miller, Sarah Wayne Callies
Original title: Prison Break
American series. Genre: Drama. Format: 42mn
Michael Scofield, an engineer and little genius at times, has decided to go all out to save his brother Lincoln, the electric chair. Accused of the murder of the brother of the Vice-President, he protested his innocence in vain. Michael has one month to integrate the Fox River State Penitentiary, making his enemies, his henchmen and Lincoln to escape certain death before they can prove his innocence ...
Great challenge for this series camera. The first season is exciting. Hard not to get caught up in the game spend all emotions: anxiety, suspense, tenderness, ... and that beloved Michael who has been so programmed his plan, probably does not do it as easily as he thought ... Unfortunately, the seasons that follow are not as exciting. Difficult to keep up on 81 episodes!
The second recounts the escape of eight prisoners who will not be easy. At the same time they try to shed light on the trap that befell Lincoln. But the hour of freedom has not yet come, and some will return to prison at Sona, in the third season. Prison left in the hands of its people, the conditions are harsher than Fox River and the escape will not be as "easy".
Finally the fourth season reveals all the secrets of the family of two brothers, secrets that led them where they are always with a sword of Damocles hanging over your head!
In short no less than three breakouts for Burrows-Scofield brothers and their associates, many missing, many betrayals (it's every man for his apple), all bogged down in countless secrets ... all this could not end in happy ending!
After four seasons of loyal (and not always good) services, the team of Prison Break leaving (finally) our small screens to sail towards new horizons. We wish them good luck!
Labels:
Dominic Purcell,
Fox River State Penitentiary,
Paul Scheuring,
Prison Break,
Sarah Wayne Callies,
Wentworth Miller
Raise the Red Lantern(Epouses et concubines or Da hong deng long gao gao gua)by Zhang Yimou
Raise the Red Lantern(Epouses et concubines or Da hong deng long gao gao gua)
Cinema Release Date: December 20, 1991
Directed by Zhang Yimou
With Gong Li, Caifei He, Cao Cuifen
Original Title: Da hong deng long gao gao gua
Feature Chinese, Taiwanese, Hong Kong. Genre: Drama
Time: 02h05min Production Year: 1991
Cinema Release Date: December 20, 1991
Directed by Zhang Yimou
With Gong Li, Caifei He, Cao Cuifen
Original Title: Da hong deng long gao gao gua
Feature Chinese, Taiwanese, Hong Kong. Genre: Drama
Time: 02h05min Production Year: 1991
We are in North China in the 20s: Songlian (Gong Li), who is 19 years old, becomes the fourth wife of the rich master Zaoquian Chen (Ma Jingwu). She will now live cloistered from the three other wives she sees only at shared meals. Yuru the first wife (Jin Shuyuan), who has passed the age to please and does not cause any concern. But it is not the same with two others with whom she faces, because they, devoured with envy, strive, whenever possible, to plot intrigues.
The second wife Zhuoyun (Caoo Quifen) revealing herself beneath a truly Machiavellian kind. It was she who indirectly causes the death of Yan'er, the servant-concubine, then Meishan, the third wife, former opera singer, who is accused of adultery with Dr. Gao. Husband flouted the will and executed by his servants in the torture chamber, and life resumed its course as if nothing had happened. Except for that Songlian, horrified by this horrible murder, turning into madness. Then a fifth wife adds to the house of the master who has the right to life and death over his women.
After Red Sorghum and Ju Du, Wives and Concubines is the third part that Zhang Yimou has devoted to women's status in China before the war, when the wife was subservient to the husband's authority and could not release herself by death or madness. Although constantly question the authority of men, they appear only furtively in the film, but the authority they have and they have over their wives captive proves haunting. In this virtual universe prison, behind closed doors this oppressive governed by immutable rites, the only element of life is constituted by the lighting of red lanterns which signals the visit of the Lord in the apartment of the wife.
He came honor for a few hours and must comply with its requirements. As in his previous films, Yimou uses the same female singer, Gong Li, with whom he was living. Songlian remarkable, she can not resign herself to a mere sexual object. Wives and Concubines stands out as a film of rare beauty and aesthetics with planes of light refined to the extreme, flamboyant images of place where unity is respected and which is by its quality, thoroughness of his narrative, a jewel of the 7th Art. Do not forget that this feature greatly contributed to the rise of Asian cinema, so little known in France and even Europe. Yimou is among those who gave the cinema of his country credentials. A film that is reviewed with the same emotion and that seems to defy time.
Labels:
Caifei He,
Cao Cuifen,
Da hong deng long gao gao gua,
Epouses et concubines,
Gong Li,
Raise the Red Lantern,
Zhang Yimou
Sunday, March 6, 2011
Movie Review: Moulin Rouge Directed by Baz Luhrmann
Moulin Rouge Directed by Baz Luhrmann
Cinema Release Date: October 3, 2001
Starring Nicole Kidman, John Leguizamo, Ewan McGregor
American feature film. Genre: Musical, Romance
Time: 02h06min Production Year: 2001
Synopsis
In Paris, a Christian and a hopeful young poet settled in Montmartre, the heart of the bohemian life. He met by chance Toulouse-Lautrec, who will convince him to write a piece for the Moulin Rouge. He will then meet with Satine, the main cheerleader of Moulin Rouge and the extravagant Harold Zidler, the owner of the tavern. He decides to help them through the room, save the cabaret face their biggest investor, the Duke of Monroth, madly in love with Satine.
Awards
• 2002 Academy Award for best costumes
• 2002 Academy Award for Best Art Direction
• 2002 Golden Globe for best comedy or musical
• Golden Globe 2002 for Nicole Kidman (Best Actress in a Comedy or Musical)
• 2002 Golden Globe for best original soundtrack (composed by Craig Armstrong)
Commentary
This film is an incredible originality! It is not a remake, comparing with other musicals. The director here recycles a wide range of existing songs for years 1940 to 2000 and re-orchestrated reinterpreted. The film is a gap grows total breaststroke inspirations, eras, styles and rhythms to produce an exuberant treatment of its themes and especially a romantic tribute to the show. This is a great movie with Nicole Kidman incredibly beautiful.
It's pretty funny to me that I had never seen this film until today! I do not know why I missed so far! Anyway, I just catch the shot and I do not regret of watching it, because it is a very good movie, very entertaining ...
But I can not go up 3 / 5 ... Strangely, I had to zap a few times, change my mind before coming back on this film ... I found some scenes rather long and annoying ... I can not find really no other words, it's true that when you see inside the Moulin Rouge for the first time, it is rather annoying ... It's too fast, too colorful, too Bouquer, we do not understand ... It's a real mess (but not organized as a brothel known to do so well Cédric Klapisch), no, here is a nasty mess, I can not explain what I really mean, I hope you understand all the same!
Apart from that, the film is vibrant, lively and quite nice, even if the story is the most classic and most mundane ... I did not find Nicole Kidman in this extraordinary film, but it was well defended here ... I was especially impressed with Ewan McGregor, his role he really stuck to the skin, it went very well, very good performance from him, I only saw him for the last 2:06 as the movie!
In short, good entertainment to watch to see new things!
Cinema Release Date: October 3, 2001
Starring Nicole Kidman, John Leguizamo, Ewan McGregor
American feature film. Genre: Musical, Romance
Time: 02h06min Production Year: 2001
Synopsis
In Paris, a Christian and a hopeful young poet settled in Montmartre, the heart of the bohemian life. He met by chance Toulouse-Lautrec, who will convince him to write a piece for the Moulin Rouge. He will then meet with Satine, the main cheerleader of Moulin Rouge and the extravagant Harold Zidler, the owner of the tavern. He decides to help them through the room, save the cabaret face their biggest investor, the Duke of Monroth, madly in love with Satine.
Awards
• 2002 Academy Award for best costumes
• 2002 Academy Award for Best Art Direction
• 2002 Golden Globe for best comedy or musical
• Golden Globe 2002 for Nicole Kidman (Best Actress in a Comedy or Musical)
• 2002 Golden Globe for best original soundtrack (composed by Craig Armstrong)
Commentary
This film is an incredible originality! It is not a remake, comparing with other musicals. The director here recycles a wide range of existing songs for years 1940 to 2000 and re-orchestrated reinterpreted. The film is a gap grows total breaststroke inspirations, eras, styles and rhythms to produce an exuberant treatment of its themes and especially a romantic tribute to the show. This is a great movie with Nicole Kidman incredibly beautiful.
It's pretty funny to me that I had never seen this film until today! I do not know why I missed so far! Anyway, I just catch the shot and I do not regret of watching it, because it is a very good movie, very entertaining ...
But I can not go up 3 / 5 ... Strangely, I had to zap a few times, change my mind before coming back on this film ... I found some scenes rather long and annoying ... I can not find really no other words, it's true that when you see inside the Moulin Rouge for the first time, it is rather annoying ... It's too fast, too colorful, too Bouquer, we do not understand ... It's a real mess (but not organized as a brothel known to do so well Cédric Klapisch), no, here is a nasty mess, I can not explain what I really mean, I hope you understand all the same!
Apart from that, the film is vibrant, lively and quite nice, even if the story is the most classic and most mundane ... I did not find Nicole Kidman in this extraordinary film, but it was well defended here ... I was especially impressed with Ewan McGregor, his role he really stuck to the skin, it went very well, very good performance from him, I only saw him for the last 2:06 as the movie!
In short, good entertainment to watch to see new things!
Labels:
Academy Award,
Baz Luhrmann,
Ewan McGregor,
Gloden Globe,
John Leguizamo,
Moulin Rouge,
movie review,
Nicole Kidman
Movie Review: Inside Job Directed by Charles Ferguson
Inside Job Directed by Charles Ferguson
Cinema Release Date: November 17, 2010
Film available on DVD on: March 23, 2011
With Matt Damon, Christine Lagarde, Dominique Strauss-Khan
American feature film. Genre: Documentary
Time: 02h00min Production Year: 2010
Oscar for Best Documentary Film: Oscars / Academy Awards 2011 Edition No. 83
Explaining the world economic crisis that we have gone through (and we still suffer the consequences)?
I could not go into details, but basically the main reason is economic deregulation, advocated all-out by economists (paid by banks) and financial administrators, mostly American (and former bankers ). It has existed for nearly thirty years, but it exploded in the last ten years and has caused this crisis.
The documentary begins in Iceland, this virtuous paradise, where banks were privatized by the government a few years ago, went crazy and have helped to bankrupt the country. Then the U.S. would follow, and finally the world or almost ...
In some chapters, Charles Ferguson dismantled one by one the mechanisms of this greed introduced by banks using speculation on real estate (subprime, etc.). For this he uses a whole battalion of economists, journalists, administrators, financial or political figures, including our two heroes Frenchies Christine Lagarde and Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
Even if the ugliest of the protagonists of this crisis not to answer questions relevant documentary, he managed to dig up some, including those teachers eco large American universities who write books paid by banks, while they are themselves consultants. In short, it's conflict of interest galore and is dumbfounded to discover also that all these crooks who have worked under the Bush administration are still there and still under that of Obama ready to find solutions.
The demonstration of this vast bazaar is so relentless and sheds light on the tragic sad world we live in, where the guilty are far too powerful to be torn to pieces. Charles Ferguson tape so where it hurts and does so remarkable even if I have to admit, despite the graphics and other figures in illustration, many elements of understanding escaped me. It is an extremely complex topic indeed, not to put before all eyes.
Cinema Release Date: November 17, 2010
Film available on DVD on: March 23, 2011
With Matt Damon, Christine Lagarde, Dominique Strauss-Khan
American feature film. Genre: Documentary
Time: 02h00min Production Year: 2010
Oscar for Best Documentary Film: Oscars / Academy Awards 2011 Edition No. 83
Explaining the world economic crisis that we have gone through (and we still suffer the consequences)?
I could not go into details, but basically the main reason is economic deregulation, advocated all-out by economists (paid by banks) and financial administrators, mostly American (and former bankers ). It has existed for nearly thirty years, but it exploded in the last ten years and has caused this crisis.
The documentary begins in Iceland, this virtuous paradise, where banks were privatized by the government a few years ago, went crazy and have helped to bankrupt the country. Then the U.S. would follow, and finally the world or almost ...
In some chapters, Charles Ferguson dismantled one by one the mechanisms of this greed introduced by banks using speculation on real estate (subprime, etc.). For this he uses a whole battalion of economists, journalists, administrators, financial or political figures, including our two heroes Frenchies Christine Lagarde and Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
Even if the ugliest of the protagonists of this crisis not to answer questions relevant documentary, he managed to dig up some, including those teachers eco large American universities who write books paid by banks, while they are themselves consultants. In short, it's conflict of interest galore and is dumbfounded to discover also that all these crooks who have worked under the Bush administration are still there and still under that of Obama ready to find solutions.
The demonstration of this vast bazaar is so relentless and sheds light on the tragic sad world we live in, where the guilty are far too powerful to be torn to pieces. Charles Ferguson tape so where it hurts and does so remarkable even if I have to admit, despite the graphics and other figures in illustration, many elements of understanding escaped me. It is an extremely complex topic indeed, not to put before all eyes.
Labels:
Best Actress Oscars,
Charles Ferguson,
Christine Lagarde,
Dominique Strauss-Khan,
economic crisis,
Inside Job Directed,
Jobs,
Matt Damon,
Obama administration
Movie Review: Corpse Bride Directed by Mike Johnson and Tim Burton
Corpse Bride Directed by Mike Johnson, Tim Burton
Cinema Release Date: October 19, 2005
With Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter, Emily Watson, more
Genre: Animation, Fantasy, Romance
Time: 01h15min Production Year: 2004
The story is that of a wealthy couple newly rich from their trade in fish that tries to establish an alliance between their only son, Victor Van Dort, and the daughter of nobles ruined, Victoria Everglot. Following the misadventures of Victor, who was unable to pronounce his vows before an audience more than disapproving during rehearsal, but falls in love with his bride anyway (good news). While it will be exercised in a wood, he spent the alliance on the part of a root by saying his vows. The innocent roots proved to be Emily, deceased bride so that he comes to marry ...
For this film, Tim Burton, Mike Johnson joins and leaves the field of multicolored The Nightmare Before Christmas Jack to adopt a more somber mood, an aesthetic blue night, fulfilling the basic code of the drama ('missing is rain on the pavement and it is good): the two filmmakers recreate the fabulous scenery and scientifically unlikely to give way to the contrast between the treatment of life and death: life is very foggy and depressing, the characters are from the stuck in the beginning of automatic physical (the time where we make a generic overview of borough, with the two fishmongers who work to reinvent the chain) and social (the rules of propriety, arranged marriage, etc.), while that death is portrayed in a joyous atmosphere, colorful, lively, noisy, where the dead have little restraint, drink, sing, and play much more than the living (hence the old "Now, Why When people go up there are dying to get down here? "). However, the finding is reversed at the end: the late Lord Barkis étripent dead and the living find themselves in love, after crossing moultes tests. Returning to the celebration of life after death than during his stay six feet under Victor.
Speaking of the end, the beginning is quite similar: the butterfly that emerges Victor chained under its glass dome symbolizes Emily, trapped by his vow and sadness (while there, I hear very distinctly my teacher movie scream "We do psychologize not the characters! "): the butterfly release from prison of glass makes the link with the last words of Emily" You've given me my freedom, I give you yours "by turning into a hundred butterflies flying towards the full moon. It also returns to life (the fashionable destination), thence to rave about reincarnation, thorny issue on which I will not venture.
This metamorphosis is a practical solution found by the scenario at a time to complete the film as it begins and to relieve the conscience of the characters and the viewer: Emily leaving the place in Victoria despite his love for Victor, at sacrifice, y ' no more tearing. But no anxiety of guilt for too long, she left for better to revive the same moon that she and Victor had admired when they first set out in the living: it goes up there alone this time, leaving behind her heart that stopped beating and who can always make her suffer.
Incidentally, the noble institution of marriage is under attack from all sides: from marriage to the dead (which there are far better than the living), marriage to Lord Barkis and Victoria looks like a funeral (of Hence this great moment during the wedding meal doleful where no one speaks and the face, Lord Barkis taps his glass and called for silence to make a speech), the ultimate marriage between a living and one dead when circumstances are outlandish situations that are set up with two married in a church looking forward to fight two husbands (one with a fork) in front of an assembly composed of dead and alive and a pastor in his skull ... and of course, arranged marriage, which involved the faces of parents whose physique has been reversed: a little big and rangy and dry Everglot wife in a solid matron plump and chirps and a thin old man in Van Dort: both sets of parents, however, are as despicable as the other one, driven by goals inglorious like to make a name or fill in the empty chest. Both lack of pity and compassion (Mrs. Van Dort respondent without stopping to check his order to stop coughing while it is busy dying), show cynicism and cruelty abhorrent their children (Victoria is sold by a husband to another, after being cloistered). If they are ubiquitous in the beginning they are not in the end, making the marriage of their children a free marriage.
Moreover, we do not see them getting married, just to swear their love before seeing smoke from Emily: the bonds of imprisonment that were supposed to be concreted their marriage are absent and emphasize their love freely.
The theme of money is ever mentioned and is the reason of all marriages in Victoria (except the last) in the end we did not see color, aside from the "dot" of Victor, who is So the fish trade, on signs of diligence, deeply hidden before arriving in Everglot. This leads to question more: in final, wanted the marriage has taken place, so parents win even overshadowed what they want, then we would have liked to see them spend a few vacation days in the hands of the dead : the end is much happier for it seems. Both marriages with Emily Victor and Victoria are forced marriages for one, arranged for another, but it ends with the most anticipated: the world of the living and the dead do not mix well, still living together, end is classic. And there is downright incomprehensible because we have yet put the dose on Emily, more charismatic, more noble than the pale Victoria: everything is done to it seem more real: it was the derision of the tenderness, jealousy, understanding ... all making up a double portrait of naive young virgin still dreaming of Prince Charming (hey it's the first time I place this one) and the mature woman who knows how to take responsibilities.
More importantly, she plays the piano while Victoria not (like say the maggot and black widow), piano very important in the love scenes: it brings together two lovers who do not know at first, and the first vision that Victoria has her promise is that of a talented musician and shy she admires, and also brings together two angry husbands underground playing piano on a coffin-two, forming the touching moment of the "Piano Duet", which incorporates the theme throughout the film (it is not kidding when Danny Elfman at the helm, yet his main song that tells the story of the death of Emily is rather weak enough). These scenes of music are relayed by the humorous moments of the film, between the street crier aware of any more effective than newspaper people.
Cinema Release Date: October 19, 2005
With Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter, Emily Watson, more
Genre: Animation, Fantasy, Romance
Time: 01h15min Production Year: 2004
The story is that of a wealthy couple newly rich from their trade in fish that tries to establish an alliance between their only son, Victor Van Dort, and the daughter of nobles ruined, Victoria Everglot. Following the misadventures of Victor, who was unable to pronounce his vows before an audience more than disapproving during rehearsal, but falls in love with his bride anyway (good news). While it will be exercised in a wood, he spent the alliance on the part of a root by saying his vows. The innocent roots proved to be Emily, deceased bride so that he comes to marry ...
For this film, Tim Burton, Mike Johnson joins and leaves the field of multicolored The Nightmare Before Christmas Jack to adopt a more somber mood, an aesthetic blue night, fulfilling the basic code of the drama ('missing is rain on the pavement and it is good): the two filmmakers recreate the fabulous scenery and scientifically unlikely to give way to the contrast between the treatment of life and death: life is very foggy and depressing, the characters are from the stuck in the beginning of automatic physical (the time where we make a generic overview of borough, with the two fishmongers who work to reinvent the chain) and social (the rules of propriety, arranged marriage, etc.), while that death is portrayed in a joyous atmosphere, colorful, lively, noisy, where the dead have little restraint, drink, sing, and play much more than the living (hence the old "Now, Why When people go up there are dying to get down here? "). However, the finding is reversed at the end: the late Lord Barkis étripent dead and the living find themselves in love, after crossing moultes tests. Returning to the celebration of life after death than during his stay six feet under Victor.
Speaking of the end, the beginning is quite similar: the butterfly that emerges Victor chained under its glass dome symbolizes Emily, trapped by his vow and sadness (while there, I hear very distinctly my teacher movie scream "We do psychologize not the characters! "): the butterfly release from prison of glass makes the link with the last words of Emily" You've given me my freedom, I give you yours "by turning into a hundred butterflies flying towards the full moon. It also returns to life (the fashionable destination), thence to rave about reincarnation, thorny issue on which I will not venture.
This metamorphosis is a practical solution found by the scenario at a time to complete the film as it begins and to relieve the conscience of the characters and the viewer: Emily leaving the place in Victoria despite his love for Victor, at sacrifice, y ' no more tearing. But no anxiety of guilt for too long, she left for better to revive the same moon that she and Victor had admired when they first set out in the living: it goes up there alone this time, leaving behind her heart that stopped beating and who can always make her suffer.
Incidentally, the noble institution of marriage is under attack from all sides: from marriage to the dead (which there are far better than the living), marriage to Lord Barkis and Victoria looks like a funeral (of Hence this great moment during the wedding meal doleful where no one speaks and the face, Lord Barkis taps his glass and called for silence to make a speech), the ultimate marriage between a living and one dead when circumstances are outlandish situations that are set up with two married in a church looking forward to fight two husbands (one with a fork) in front of an assembly composed of dead and alive and a pastor in his skull ... and of course, arranged marriage, which involved the faces of parents whose physique has been reversed: a little big and rangy and dry Everglot wife in a solid matron plump and chirps and a thin old man in Van Dort: both sets of parents, however, are as despicable as the other one, driven by goals inglorious like to make a name or fill in the empty chest. Both lack of pity and compassion (Mrs. Van Dort respondent without stopping to check his order to stop coughing while it is busy dying), show cynicism and cruelty abhorrent their children (Victoria is sold by a husband to another, after being cloistered). If they are ubiquitous in the beginning they are not in the end, making the marriage of their children a free marriage.
Moreover, we do not see them getting married, just to swear their love before seeing smoke from Emily: the bonds of imprisonment that were supposed to be concreted their marriage are absent and emphasize their love freely.
The theme of money is ever mentioned and is the reason of all marriages in Victoria (except the last) in the end we did not see color, aside from the "dot" of Victor, who is So the fish trade, on signs of diligence, deeply hidden before arriving in Everglot. This leads to question more: in final, wanted the marriage has taken place, so parents win even overshadowed what they want, then we would have liked to see them spend a few vacation days in the hands of the dead : the end is much happier for it seems. Both marriages with Emily Victor and Victoria are forced marriages for one, arranged for another, but it ends with the most anticipated: the world of the living and the dead do not mix well, still living together, end is classic. And there is downright incomprehensible because we have yet put the dose on Emily, more charismatic, more noble than the pale Victoria: everything is done to it seem more real: it was the derision of the tenderness, jealousy, understanding ... all making up a double portrait of naive young virgin still dreaming of Prince Charming (hey it's the first time I place this one) and the mature woman who knows how to take responsibilities.
More importantly, she plays the piano while Victoria not (like say the maggot and black widow), piano very important in the love scenes: it brings together two lovers who do not know at first, and the first vision that Victoria has her promise is that of a talented musician and shy she admires, and also brings together two angry husbands underground playing piano on a coffin-two, forming the touching moment of the "Piano Duet", which incorporates the theme throughout the film (it is not kidding when Danny Elfman at the helm, yet his main song that tells the story of the death of Emily is rather weak enough). These scenes of music are relayed by the humorous moments of the film, between the street crier aware of any more effective than newspaper people.
Movie Review: The King's Speech Directed by Tom Hooper
The King's Speech Directed by Tom Hooper
Cinema Release Date: February 2, 2011
With Colin Firth, Helena Bonham Carter, Derek Jacobi, more
Feature British, Australian, American. Genre: Historical, Biopic, Drama
Time: 01h58min Production Year: 2010
Distributor: Wild Bunch Distribution
Best Picture Oscar: Oscars / Academy Awards 2011 Edition No. 83
Winner announced (but deserved?) The last Oscars, "the speech of a King" by Tom Hooper has been hailed by French and U.S. press as one of the major films in this year. The story of a king of England who has difficulty in speaking due to a stutter, and who finds himself facing a unique Orthopaedic and ready to prepare to take his responsibilities as king and leader facing the entire nation at the dawn of a war that looks terrible and deadly for all.
For a historical film, this story seems perfectly appropriate. But fortunately it is covered by an excellent cast and beautiful music (Alexandre Desplat, one of the only major French composers alongside Morricone, Williams, Zimmer, Cosma ...) otherwise the whole would seem bland and far from show a real interest to the public. During two hours of film (about), we discover the secrets of power and personality of a king who is not untouchable he wants to believe. The ravages of the conventions and traditions are huge (the part about Edward's brother, George VI, King of England short aptly demonstrated ...)
A just king, lost, alone with a power failure and it cannot stop and has found support, a true friend who will help him become a king and a responsible leader of confidence, role requiring (A role reward) income is one of the most gifted English players of this decade (and has to wait for the next one to be justly rewarded), Colin Firth. A class royal style impeccable, sensitive and uncontrollable body movements at a time, its performance is incredible (it outperforms Jesse Eisenberg, the other big male performance of the last Oscars) and touching, you want to see it achieve its future King destiny and finally be considered by all. Geoffrey Rush is very good in Orthopaedic breaker of traditions and who will get his patients back to themselves to awaken their voice, and Helena Bonham Carter's different roles in her husband Tim Burton, more fragile than usual.
But the big flaw that taints the whole work is its director, Tom Hooper, totally overrated by critics who dare nothing, he uses what appears to be suitable to advance the story without real research . I do not see why when a film tackles a subject of time, everything has to be the former. The test with Sofia Coppola's "Marie Antoinette" (which I have not seen) was a first step, but Tom Hooper made film history back in time (Stronger than Doc Brown and his Delorean!) And brings it all the traditions that the scenario calls for break forward.
A beautiful film, but consisting largely interpreted and realized Ave boredom and simplicity, which prevents it from becoming a great movie.
Cinema Release Date: February 2, 2011
With Colin Firth, Helena Bonham Carter, Derek Jacobi, more
Feature British, Australian, American. Genre: Historical, Biopic, Drama
Time: 01h58min Production Year: 2010
Distributor: Wild Bunch Distribution
Best Picture Oscar: Oscars / Academy Awards 2011 Edition No. 83
Winner announced (but deserved?) The last Oscars, "the speech of a King" by Tom Hooper has been hailed by French and U.S. press as one of the major films in this year. The story of a king of England who has difficulty in speaking due to a stutter, and who finds himself facing a unique Orthopaedic and ready to prepare to take his responsibilities as king and leader facing the entire nation at the dawn of a war that looks terrible and deadly for all.
For a historical film, this story seems perfectly appropriate. But fortunately it is covered by an excellent cast and beautiful music (Alexandre Desplat, one of the only major French composers alongside Morricone, Williams, Zimmer, Cosma ...) otherwise the whole would seem bland and far from show a real interest to the public. During two hours of film (about), we discover the secrets of power and personality of a king who is not untouchable he wants to believe. The ravages of the conventions and traditions are huge (the part about Edward's brother, George VI, King of England short aptly demonstrated ...)
A just king, lost, alone with a power failure and it cannot stop and has found support, a true friend who will help him become a king and a responsible leader of confidence, role requiring (A role reward) income is one of the most gifted English players of this decade (and has to wait for the next one to be justly rewarded), Colin Firth. A class royal style impeccable, sensitive and uncontrollable body movements at a time, its performance is incredible (it outperforms Jesse Eisenberg, the other big male performance of the last Oscars) and touching, you want to see it achieve its future King destiny and finally be considered by all. Geoffrey Rush is very good in Orthopaedic breaker of traditions and who will get his patients back to themselves to awaken their voice, and Helena Bonham Carter's different roles in her husband Tim Burton, more fragile than usual.
But the big flaw that taints the whole work is its director, Tom Hooper, totally overrated by critics who dare nothing, he uses what appears to be suitable to advance the story without real research . I do not see why when a film tackles a subject of time, everything has to be the former. The test with Sofia Coppola's "Marie Antoinette" (which I have not seen) was a first step, but Tom Hooper made film history back in time (Stronger than Doc Brown and his Delorean!) And brings it all the traditions that the scenario calls for break forward.
A beautiful film, but consisting largely interpreted and realized Ave boredom and simplicity, which prevents it from becoming a great movie.
Labels:
ascar,
Best Actress Oscars,
Colin Firth,
Derek Jacobi,
film,
George VI,
Helena Bonham Carter,
The King's Speech Directed,
Tom Hooper
Movie Review:Inception by Christopher Nolan
Inception
Cinema Release Date: July 21, 2010
Film already available on DVD since: December 8, 2010
Directed by Christopher Nolan
With Leonardo DiCaprio, Marion Cotillard, Ellen Page
Feature film, U.S., UK. Genre: Science Fiction, Thriller
Time: 02h28min Production Year: 2010
Oscar Best Cinematography: Oscars / Academy Awards 2011 Edition No. 83
Cobb is a specialist in a very particular kind of espionage, one of the mind. His goal: to extract the ideas in the brain of a subject by placing it in a forced sleep. Indeed, his job is to extract the secrets of the subconscious of his "patients". Explanations: the person is administered a sedative ultra-powerful, injected by a machine connected to the person. After a failed attempt at extraction, the spirit of this spy gets a strange proposition: do the opposite. It is indeed an idea implanted in the subconscious of a subject in order to convince the company to dismantle her late father, a practicing inception. A key, the return to his homeland where he is banished for too long: the United States.
To do this, you need: an extractor, here implementer, Cobb (Leonardo Di Caprio, again perfect after Shutter Island), a forger (Tom Hardy), an architect (the craquanate Ellen Page), a manager (Joseph Gordon-Levitt ) and a chemist (Dileep Rao). The subject is placed in the dream, it reveals its secrets (which may be hidden in safe places), he fills his dreams with subconscious (those are projections of his ego) but it is the architect who "built" the world.
After The Dark Knight, Christopher Nolan réusssit impossible. The film, which is neither a remake nor a sequel or an adaptation of comic book has gleaned almost a billion worldwide in a period more prone than brainless blockbusters movies of this ilk brain . It must be said that the director prodigy followings, Memento and Insomnia took ten years to realize this project, peufinant whenever he could, and raising its ambitions on the rise year after year. The result is simply stunning dexterity and mastery of narrative. Slow down, weightlessness and temporal variation that can escape from the brain of a genius like Nolan.
Maybe this is the paradox of the film, the director from his subconscious the best there is. Dreams and reality mingle without the viewer is lost. The visionary idea of the time offset, the simultaneous assembly and lymbes are undeniable evidence of the intellectual potential of the filmmaker. Now he has the Warner Bros.. at his feet, Nolan has a clear field for us to lay a The Dark Knight Rises fire of God (in full IMAX're crazy!) and was even called in reinforcements to the Superman we prepare Zack Snyder as a consultant. And let's not forget his brother, John, co-writer on several films as Terminator Salvation. So family.
Lest We Forget (crowing!) Providing ultra touching our national Marion Cotillard at the top of his art and beauty, disturbing class, ambiguity and madness. If the universe "James Bond meets The Matrix" (aptly described by Rolling Stone) draws heavily on Paprika, Avalon, and Philip K. Dick, director y instillle its own style. The fall of the van that takes the last 45 minutes of the film will live long in people's minds. But the real tour de force of the film lies in dreams intertwined. No one before him had made the concept of dream as clear, even for Cronenberg eXistenZ or Michel Gondry for Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind. It creates the strata of his universe, his own reality and raises the hearing. Proof that you can make a film to $ 150 million and understandable.
Meanwhile, the router runs Cobb she always?
Cinema Release Date: July 21, 2010
Film already available on DVD since: December 8, 2010
Directed by Christopher Nolan
With Leonardo DiCaprio, Marion Cotillard, Ellen Page
Feature film, U.S., UK. Genre: Science Fiction, Thriller
Time: 02h28min Production Year: 2010
Oscar Best Cinematography: Oscars / Academy Awards 2011 Edition No. 83
Cobb is a specialist in a very particular kind of espionage, one of the mind. His goal: to extract the ideas in the brain of a subject by placing it in a forced sleep. Indeed, his job is to extract the secrets of the subconscious of his "patients". Explanations: the person is administered a sedative ultra-powerful, injected by a machine connected to the person. After a failed attempt at extraction, the spirit of this spy gets a strange proposition: do the opposite. It is indeed an idea implanted in the subconscious of a subject in order to convince the company to dismantle her late father, a practicing inception. A key, the return to his homeland where he is banished for too long: the United States.
To do this, you need: an extractor, here implementer, Cobb (Leonardo Di Caprio, again perfect after Shutter Island), a forger (Tom Hardy), an architect (the craquanate Ellen Page), a manager (Joseph Gordon-Levitt ) and a chemist (Dileep Rao). The subject is placed in the dream, it reveals its secrets (which may be hidden in safe places), he fills his dreams with subconscious (those are projections of his ego) but it is the architect who "built" the world.
After The Dark Knight, Christopher Nolan réusssit impossible. The film, which is neither a remake nor a sequel or an adaptation of comic book has gleaned almost a billion worldwide in a period more prone than brainless blockbusters movies of this ilk brain . It must be said that the director prodigy followings, Memento and Insomnia took ten years to realize this project, peufinant whenever he could, and raising its ambitions on the rise year after year. The result is simply stunning dexterity and mastery of narrative. Slow down, weightlessness and temporal variation that can escape from the brain of a genius like Nolan.
Maybe this is the paradox of the film, the director from his subconscious the best there is. Dreams and reality mingle without the viewer is lost. The visionary idea of the time offset, the simultaneous assembly and lymbes are undeniable evidence of the intellectual potential of the filmmaker. Now he has the Warner Bros.. at his feet, Nolan has a clear field for us to lay a The Dark Knight Rises fire of God (in full IMAX're crazy!) and was even called in reinforcements to the Superman we prepare Zack Snyder as a consultant. And let's not forget his brother, John, co-writer on several films as Terminator Salvation. So family.
Lest We Forget (crowing!) Providing ultra touching our national Marion Cotillard at the top of his art and beauty, disturbing class, ambiguity and madness. If the universe "James Bond meets The Matrix" (aptly described by Rolling Stone) draws heavily on Paprika, Avalon, and Philip K. Dick, director y instillle its own style. The fall of the van that takes the last 45 minutes of the film will live long in people's minds. But the real tour de force of the film lies in dreams intertwined. No one before him had made the concept of dream as clear, even for Cronenberg eXistenZ or Michel Gondry for Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind. It creates the strata of his universe, his own reality and raises the hearing. Proof that you can make a film to $ 150 million and understandable.
Meanwhile, the router runs Cobb she always?
Labels:
Christopher Nolan,
Ellen Page,
Inception,
Leonardo DiCaprio,
Marion Cotillard,
Oscar Best Cinematography
Movie Review:Black Swan
Movie Review:Black Swan
Cinema Release Date: February 9, 2011
Directed by Darren Aronofsky
Natalie Portman, Mila Kunis, Vincent Cassel
Genre: Drama, Thriller, Fantasy
Time: 01h43min Production Year: 2010
Oscar for Best Actress Oscars / Academy Awards 2011 Edition No. 83
The ballet world is a rare movie universe, a context shunned by filmmakers, yet inspiring through its themes of a conception of cinema, a use of genres and topics. This has certainly attracted Darren Aronofsky at the time to attack his new screenplay (he wrote all of his films), a world bathed in grace, and the competition is exceeded. And it is this angle that the director of Requiem for a Dream has shaped his script, the staging of artistic involvement as much physical as moral, treated realistically for one and the other unreal.
Cinema Release Date: February 9, 2011
Directed by Darren Aronofsky
Natalie Portman, Mila Kunis, Vincent Cassel
Genre: Drama, Thriller, Fantasy
Time: 01h43min Production Year: 2010
Oscar for Best Actress Oscars / Academy Awards 2011 Edition No. 83
The ballet world is a rare movie universe, a context shunned by filmmakers, yet inspiring through its themes of a conception of cinema, a use of genres and topics. This has certainly attracted Darren Aronofsky at the time to attack his new screenplay (he wrote all of his films), a world bathed in grace, and the competition is exceeded. And it is this angle that the director of Requiem for a Dream has shaped his script, the staging of artistic involvement as much physical as moral, treated realistically for one and the other unreal.
Because who has ever been fascinated by this ritual perfection, this coordination of movements choreographed to the pinnacle of his success with young women obsessed by fear of failure, as owned by their roles. A fascination that has the appearance that the extreme difficulty of its implementation, both sides of the same art, two sides of the same person, a duality personified by the character of Natalie Portman and even the theme of the ballet it begins: Swan Lake. As high in the cult of artistic perfection by a castrating mother, Nina Sayers (Portman) lives only for the art she has: the ballet, its ultimate goal: getting the lead role of Swan Lake. So it seems to approach the goal, another dancer and joined the troupe creates doubt in the minds of Nina, a condition that will cease to apply to the dancer, obsessed by the desire to embody the better as pure as the dark side of his character, to the point of no return?
Aronofsky had already proven itself in the art of staging at the brilliant but disturbing Requiem for a Dream, is also his main concern. The choice of seeing his new story walking the halls of New York City Ballet is no stranger there and allows the director to cultivate his thirst for the exercise of style while perfecting his art director. Until you reach perfection? Surely, Aronofsky is at the top of his art can take an understatement, and yet the man is still in its fifth embodiment, a clear way to say that American's talent is unique, which Black Swan is its fulfillment. For everything there is to control the evolution of characters in his script, the style control to the practice of staging a rare perfect movies are also running a grip: that of the image. In the wake of Natalie Portman at the top of his game, alternating the absolute fragility of virgin and innocent character she plays with the madness of his psychic metamorphosis, Aronofsky takes the viewer on a captivating work, metaphorically representative of the universe selected and subjected to a staged hallucinations, near perfection.
Schizophrenia behavioral excess pretext for all situations, Black Swan cordially invites his ballet illusory debauchery: sex, omnipresent, filmed with grace, following the game of seduction with the viewer, drugs, violence, blood, all of which are repulsive tilt the film in black and the work we dive into total darkness, between dream and reality. Yet the film does not fall into the horror or the dread, just a chilling atmosphere, which installs doubt on each scene, which maintains the motivations of each character (including Mila Kunis, poisonous), we assists and dazzled the screenplay metaphor of a ballet and its history, launched on stage, thrilling to the sounds of classical music by Tchaikovsky, is flat.
The suspense was no longer a Black Swan is up to the expectations placed in him, both aesthetic and experimental work is in the extreme performance of a directing style, a talent to service its staged, dreamlike and captivating, a unique charm to what appears to be nothing less than a masterpiece.
Labels:
Best Actress Oscars,
Black Swan,
Darren Aronofsky,
Mila Kunis,
Natalie Portman,
Oscar,
Vincent Cassel
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Book Review: Jackson Lears, Rebirth of a Nation: The Making of Modern America, 1877-1920
Jackson Lears, Rebirth of a Nation: The Making of Modern America, 1877-1920 (Harper: HarperCollins Publishers, 2010)
Stephen Skowronek, Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)
Unlike Skowronek who approached the history of this period in terms of the formation of a new American state, Jackson Lears, an expert in interpreting American cultural history, examines the American history of this period from the perspective of rebirth. Before publishing Rebirth of a Nation: The Making of Modern America, 1877-1920, Lears has already published several monographs on American cultural history. In No Place of Grace: Antimodernism and the Transformation of American Culture, 1880-1920, taking Englishmen John Ruskin and William Morris and their American disciples as case studies, Lears examines aesthetic radicals and the humane alternatives to consumerism that gradually shifted from social justice to ideals of therapeutic personal fulfillment. Moreover, in Fables of Abundance: A Cultural History of Advertising in America, he explores the exploitation of that hunger for "authenticity" that resulted from the earlier process. Based on these works on American culture, he furthers his understanding of American culture and history in his new book ─ Rebirth of a Nation: The Making of Modern America, 1877-1920.
In this book, Lears discusses the transformations America underwent in the half century's journey since the Civil War. Before him, there are several classics in interpreting American history in this period. In The Age of Reform: From Bryan to FDR (1955), connecting the populism, progressive movement and the New Deal together, Richard Hofstadter discusses how the American history is in an age of reform. Taking reconstruction as a good lens to understand the American history since the Civil War, in Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution (1988), Eric Foner talks about how the reconstruction failed and its impact on the African Americans. Both Hofstadter and Foner greatly help us to understand the American history in this period. However, unlike them, Lears describes his book as a “synthetic reinterpretation” of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era and attempts to challenge their authority in this field. He argues:
All history is the history of longing. The details of policy; the migration of peoples; the abstractions that nations kill and die for, including the abstraction of ‘the nation’ itself ─ all can be ultimately traced to the viscera of human desire. Human beings have wanted innumerable, often contradictory things ─ security and dignity, power and domination, sheer excitement and mere survival, unconditional love and eternal salvation ─ and those desires have animated public life. The political has always been personal.[1]
For Lears, the American history between the Civil War and World War I was a period dominated by personal longings. According to him, “personal longings become peculiarly influential in political life; private emotions and public policies resonate with special force, creating seismic change. This was what happened in the United States between the Civil War and World War I.”[2] Therefore, the historical writing of the American history could be based on the personal longings.
With Rebirth of a Nation, he discusses the militarist fantasies of rebirth through violence, war and empire in this period. Beginning in the 1870s, he points out, Americans attempted to stitch their country back together around a “militarist fantasy” of Anglo-Saxon supremacy. However, their efforts produced tragedy. White mobs in the south attacked the slaves who were emancipated by the Lincoln government and endowed their legitimate rights in the 13th, 14th and 15th constitutional amendments. In the west frontier, the Federal troops massacred a large number of unarmed Indians at Wounded Knee; in East Asia, at the beginning of the century, U.S. commanders in the Philippines killed American civilians there who resisted the U.S. imperial claims.
Lears also mentions the major trends of the age: the rise of industrial capitalism, the expansion of American empire, the tightening chokehold of Jim Crow. “The rise of total war between the Civil War and World War I was rooted in longings for release from bourgeois normality into a realm of heroic struggle,” he writes. “This was the desperate anxiety, the yearning for rebirth that lay behind official ideologies of romantic nationalism, imperial progress and civilizing mission — and that led to the trenches of the Western Front.”[3] Reinterpreting American history in terms of longing and rebirth, Lears captures the features of the psychic crisis of the United States.
In interpreting the making of the modern America, Skowronek and Lears both contributed a lot to our understanding of the history in this period. Skowronek mainly focused on the state-building and its transformation in American history, Lears pays more attention to the rebirth of a new nation. The former was greatly indebted to the historical sociologists in the 1970s and 1980s, like Charles Tilly, Barrington Moore, and Theda Skocpol and so on; the later was greatly influenced by the cultural turn of American history. Both rebirth and state-building are goods lens, however, for those who don’t like imagine, fantasy, personal longings, Lears’s book might be a little difficult for them to read his book. As for Skowronek’s book, for those who wants to understand American history through culture and anecdotes, it might be a little boring to read a book which just focuses on army, administrative capacity and civil services. Anyway, state-building and rebirth offer them two perspectives to approach American history in this period. Both of them are very provocative and challenging. After all, different historians have their different points of view in understanding American history.
[1] Jackson Lears, Rebirth of a Nation: The Making of Modern America, 1877-1920 (Harper: HarperCollins Publishers, 2010), 1.
[3] Lears, ibid, 8.
Labels:
Building a New American State,
Jackson Lears,
Rebirth of a Nation,
Stephen Skowronek,
The Making of Modern America
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
















